RED RIDING HOOD
There's good news for fans in need of a fix of
"dark-fantasy", which is the genre this movie really falls into. The
retelling of the classic fairy-tale is fun and keeps you guessing. The movie
is adapted to feature a medievil "village in the woods" story, where the
villagers live in fear of werewolves, or rather one particular beast. There
are all the elements of the children's tale: the woodsman (actaully men)
with the axe (many axes), the grandmother's house, and the little lady who
goes for a forest stroll in her red- hooded cloak. Updates include a rich,
mercenary-for-hire type played by the great Gary Oldman, who has his own
private army. He lives to wipe out just such beaties.
The other big tweaks include meeting Red Riding
Hood's family, a love triangle or two, and the main character has both a
name and is a little more grown up than we're used to: "Valerie" is played
by 25 year old Amanda Seyfried (of Momma Mia fame). This time around, the
creature is more than just a wolf, but a big powerful beast of the
black-magic realm. And, during the week of the Blood Moon (when mars and the
moon align every 13 years--how unlucky-- to make a more reddish colored
moon) its' bite doesn't just kill you: it can transform you.
Apparantly this version came about from a
late-night chat Leonardo Dicaprio was having with friends, about adding
twists and tension to the classic plot. Leo is listed as producer, and
actually many of the names attached to this film give it some unexpected
traction; starting with director Catherine Hardwick, who helmed the first
Twilight film as well. The Screenplay is by David Leslie Johnson (he also
crafted the horror-adoption story Orphan). The cast benefits from two other
beautiful women: 49 year old Virgina Madsen (Candyman) as the central
character's mother, and 69 year old but still mesmerizing Julie Christie (of
2006's Away From Her and many many others) as the Grandmother, complete with
her own isolated cabin in the woods. Both of these women added far more
watchability for me than the actual star, Seyfried. I'm sure the twilight
generation will love Seyfried as the centre of this flick, so they'll be
happy too.
This movie shares some similarity with the M
Night Shyamalan tale "The Village" in that the tiny self-contained hamlet is
terrorized by a beast...but has developed a system to satisfy the killer by
offering up livestock. Unlike in The Village, however, this beast is seen
often and is lightning fast. Silver still seems to have some hold over the
creature, and this time around werewolves cannot enter holy ground, making
the town church a safe spot.
What turns this film into a fun ride is the
revelation (no spolier: this is in many of the ads & trailer) that the
monster doens't live outside the town, but is more likely one of its' own
inhabitants, living in hungry-hiding among the villagers. The last half of
the film keeps you guessing and re-guessing on who is the furball in our
midsts. I'm happy to say I didn't see the reveal coming, which made for a
pleasant surprise for me as a viewer.
Also worth the price of admission is the
simplicity of the story. Keeping true to the roots of most fairytales and
children's legends, the plot is deceptively and effortlessly simple and
small in scope, while still packing lots of twists. The color and visuals
are occassionally a sight to behold, especially the image of the vibrant red
cloak billowing out over a crisp, white, snowcovered mounstainside.
And you'll love it when you hear those famous
words: "...what big eyes you have..."
3 great things about this movie:
*The creature: it looks like a good ol'fashioned
werewolf terrorizing a village should: nothing too outlandsih, yet still not
your run-of-the-mill pooch
*The female supporting cast: see comments above;
enough said.
*The soundtrack and costumes capture the stark,
simple, scary feel of the story perfectly. Except for one flaw mentioned
below....
3 bad things about this movie:
*The wardrobe for Gary Oldman....I got tired of
seeing his poorly disguised back-zipper flapon his royal purple tunic. It
kept pulling me out of the story and reminding he was an actor. None of the
other costumes seemed to suffer from this
*The similarity to Shayamaln's The Village will
seem like a bit of a plot-theft to movie buffs who notice it
*The elephant in the room...er...in the town. I
can't explain it here, you'll know what I mean. It seems like a bad idea a
writer or producer came up with, and should've been edited out
Overall a very watchable retalling of the fable
, with a dash of who-dunit thrown in.....rating: 3.75 cookies out of 5.
<<<<CHYATT